Comments for Oracle Herald http://htendam.wordpress.com Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:36:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Oracle 11g and Documentum (Part 3) by htendam http://htendam.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/oracle-11g-and-documentum-part-3/#comment-16 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:36:51 +0000 http://htendam.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-16 Hi,

I edited the previous comment, the links didn’t show. The document can only be found on Powerlink/Support.

Herald

]]> Comment on Oracle 11g and Documentum (Part 3) by adam http://htendam.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/oracle-11g-and-documentum-part-3/#comment-15 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:20:36 +0000 http://htendam.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-15 Hi,

I tried to search this document on EMC community but no success. Could you please help.

Thanks

]]> Comment on Oracle 11g and Documentum (Part 3) by htendam http://htendam.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/oracle-11g-and-documentum-part-3/#comment-14 Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:18:29 +0000 http://htendam.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-14 Hi Adam,

EMC has the note ESG102057 on Powerlink, so you need a login (see ESG102057): Since October 2012 this note states thas as of 10.2.0.3 for Oracle the best settings are to leave them default (100/0).

We started of course also with the 95/5 settings (see also my first post about it: Documentum settings). Later on we choose 100/0 (database 11.1.0.7) and it worked better, but not all. 2 Months ago we upgraded to Oracle 11.2.0.3 and it works as a sharm. Much better than 11.1.0.7, certainly in the are where there are a lot of bind variables. Also the Plans are more stable in this version.

So I recommended to leave the parameters at the default.

Herald
PS. I edit the links, the didn’t show up.

]]> Comment on Oracle 11g and Documentum (Part 3) by adam http://htendam.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/oracle-11g-and-documentum-part-3/#comment-13 Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:33:11 +0000 http://htendam.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-13 Hi,

Could you please recommend the values we need to use with documentum. for optimizer_index_cost_adj (OICA), and the optimizer_index_caching (OIC) parameters.

Thanks

]]> Comment on Oracle 11g and Documentum by htendam http://htendam.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/oracle-11g-and-documentum/#comment-10 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:59:36 +0000 http://htendam.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-10 I have no experience with 10g. But now with 11g the default parameters are running smoothly on a 11g database. The only thing I can comment extra is on some tables it is the best to get statitics without Histograms, on some tables even the performance goes up without any statistics; these tables are the one used for workflows.

]]> Comment on Oracle 11g and Documentum by David Bailey http://htendam.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/oracle-11g-and-documentum/#comment-9 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:31:02 +0000 http://htendam.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-9 I’ve found the opposite to be true in terms of query performance in 10G with respect to the optimizer parameters you referenced – 5/95 can make a significant improvement in the elapsed time for queries over 100/0

]]> Comment on Contact by Marco Gralike http://htendam.wordpress.com/contact/#comment-3 Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:58:16 +0000 #comment-3 Great name for a site
;-)

]]>